Understanding Climate Risk

Science, policy and decision-making

The scientific origins of the gradualist adaptation narrative and how to move beyond it

with 2 comments

The following statements are typical of the gradualist adaptation narrative:

  1. Within limits, the impacts of gradual climate change should be manageable.
  2. Therefore, climate change adaptation can be understood as: (a) adapting to gradual changes in average temperature, sea level and precipitation.
  3. Gradual climate change allows for a gradual shift in the mix of crops and to alternative farming systems.

So why are Gauss and Newton in the bath and Ed Lorenz in the hot tub?

Bath&Jacuzzi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Physics says that climate change cannot be gradual

The First Law of Thermodynamics (conservation of energy) describes how much the Earth will warm. Greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere but because air holds little heat, most goes into the ocean. This heat is re-released into the atmosphere as Earth warms towards equilibrium.

Under the simplest model, the ocean behaves like a bath that warms under the heat of a radiator. The warm bathwater then heats the atmosphere above until they are at similar temperatures. This heat transfer is usually represented as a linear process and communicated as smooth curves of change.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics describes how climate will change. The climate system evolves into a state where it can change into the maximum number of future possibilities. In a complex system, influenced by radiation imbalances, rotation, tides, gravity, wind, atmospheric friction and ocean-atmosphere interactions, the process of heat transfer is strongly non-linear, characterised by multiple state changes. The ocean-atmosphere system behaves more like a hot tub than a bath (see below).

Why then, is adaptation dominated by a gradualist narrative? It’s time to get out of the bath.

WORLD JonesR

Origin of the gradualist narrative

The gradualistic narrative can be explored through the structure of a scientific paradigm, which consists of three main elements – theory, methods and values.

  • Theory forms the core of science and is justified by evidence.
  • Methods are used to analyse and communicate evidence and are associated with a set of values.
  • Scientific values include reproducible observations and experiments, objectivity, peer review and the development of models with predictive skill.

If theory suggests that climate change is non-linear, why is it so often represented as a gradual process?

The reasons are in the historical development of scientific methods and their related values (see timeline below).

The origin of the gradualist narrative has its roots the scientific enlightenment. The subsequent development of methods and values have failed to address the
non-linearity present in scientific theory and evidence (see 1963 on the timeline).

The climate science community decides how their findings should be communicated and delivered. Critical information about changing climate risk is being discarded in the process.

TIMELINE JonesR

Risks of the gradualist adaptation narrative

Expectations of gradual change lead to the following shortcomings:

  • Observed changes in climate risk are being dismissed as short-term random variability when they are not.
  • Adaptation is delayed in anticipation of changes being gradual over time.
  • Delay increases the risk of under-adaptation and irreversible loss.
  • Incremental change is being preferred to transition or transformation.

Reactive responses to rapid changes after the fact are more expensive than planned adaptation.

Beyond gradualism

The following actions will ensure that theory, methods and values are more consistent with each other and can better address changing climate risk:

  • Recognise the social constructions inherent in the scientific method and ensure that it accurately reflects theory and observations.
  • Cease the scientific gatekeeping of climate information and develop communication strategies with the users of that information.
  • Address risk more comprehensively in how climate data is prepared and communicated.
  • Explore the set of adaptation options on the table in order to determine which information may be most relevant to decision-making.
  • Develop scenarios that anticipate rapid changes in risk but that are inherently unpredictable.
  • Develop statistics for assessing the magnitude and likelihood of rapid changes in climate.
  • Improve the scientific understanding of why and how non-linear changes in climate occur, to improve their detectability, and perhaps, prediction.

Gradualism Poster FIN

Advertisements

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] below). The post has two excellent charts illustrating climate change and climate science. The scientific origins of the gradualist adaptation narrative and how to move beyond it | Understand… Sign in or Register Now to […]

  2. […] away in the chapter texts of IPCC reports (See Box 11.1, paragraph 1 in link) then subsequently ignored in practice. Instead, there is a continual re-emphasis on the long-term trend. There is no objective way to […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: