Posts Tagged ‘#destroyingthejoint’
Wicked, epic fail problem
Two strategies used in problem solving are reframing and rebadging. A problem can often be reframed or looked at in a different way. Any parent who uses reverse psychology to turn a chore into a game knows that one – Tom Sawyer getting his friends to whitewash the fence for fun is a classic example.
Expert and operating languages around a problem-solution sequence has one or more specific grammars. These terms become the labels for a particular narrative that contains a problem, a process and an outcome. So when Paul Harris, Deputy Director of the HC Coombs Policy Forum at the ANU has a go at wicked problems (Rittel and Webber, 1973) for being, well, wicked – is he rebadging, reframing or is a he just erecting a straw man and flaying it to bits in an attempt to change a prevailing narrative?
Harris’ complaint is about wicked problems. They are everywhere and their number is constantly growing: Read the rest of this entry »
Written by Roger Jones
September 10, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Posted in Decision-making, Philosophy, Policy, Risk, Risk perception, Scientific method, Wicked problems
Tagged with #destroyingthejoint, Decision-making, Paul Harris, The Conversation, wicked problems