Understanding Climate Risk

Science, policy and decision-making

Environment Canada budget slashed: Adaptation and Impacts Research shut down

with 3 comments

The conservative Harper Government in Canada has cut over $200 million from the budget of Environment Canada, resulting in the loss of 1,211 jobs over the next three years. Some of the biggest cuts were in the program activities of Climate Change and Clean Air, Substance and Waste Management, Weather and Environmental Services, Water Resources and Internal Services. The programs that were cut this year include, the Clean Air Agenda and the Air Quality Health Index. The programs that will be cut next year include Species at Risk.

Included in the swingeing cuts is the Adaptation and Impacts Research branch. From their website:

Environment Canada has undertaken impacts and adaptation science for more than 15 years, developing methodologies and tools, and interpreting climate and weather data.  Environment Canada conducts impacts research to improve our understanding of the sensitivities of sectors, regions, people and property to a changing climate in order to help develop appropriate adaptation actions, with implementing partners, for the benefit of all Canadians.  Multi-disciplinary studies have led to numerous adaptation success stories to safeguard health, safety, economic competitiveness and the biological diversity of Canada.

Professor Ian Burton:

I  regret to have to tell you that the Adaptation and Impact Research group that I established in Environment Canada some
17 years ago has  been axed (It’s not quite dead yet but most of the senior scientists have received “surplus to requirements” letters). This is just the first round of the drastic budget cutting that is expected.

This is disappointing news as the group has been really innovative over its history. The group has had close contact with Australian adaptation research over the years. Ian Burton: “Partly its a Conservative Federal Government that wants as little as possible to do with climate change, and partly it’s a strategy to pass the buck to the Provinces and municipalities.”

The assumption here is that adaptation is local, not the responsibility of a national government. This is a misreading of the truism that mitigation is global and adaptation local. While impacts are locally specific and most adaptation actions need to be at that scale, institutional and governance arrangements need to be made at all scales. Likewise with research, having a nationl focus for adaptation research and implementation is a key part of sustainability science. Likewise for all other forms of environmental management taking in water, clean environments, species and ecosystems and so on. National governments provide coordination and capacity, province and local government manages regulation and delivery.

Conservative politics in the English speaking developed countries of the USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia is in a race to the bottom. This isn’t a statement of my political position (which suggests that bipartisanship should be the cornerstone of environmental sustainability), it’s an observation backed up by a shitload of evidence.


Written by Roger Jones

August 7, 2011 at 12:11 pm

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. sigh 😦


    August 16, 2011 at 7:03 pm

  2. dear Roger Jones
    as if i needed another reason to despise stephen harper the sad bad news keeps rolling in. harper – oil corporation stooge from yea to nay. a total sh!thead. i hope his death is painful & slow. he even found a way to screw up the simple collection of reliable national statistics when he scrapped the mandatory long-form census. he bullied & lied & used trumped up e-mail numbers from the usual tin-foil-hat, gov’t-gonna-barcode-y’all brigade to justify scrapping a 60 year old longitudinal national data set. stupid beyond words – national statistician resigned. business as usual for stephen harper. and he’s ensconced. damn.
    thanks for your report & the opportunity provided here to sound-off.
    yours sincerely
    alfred venison
    p.s. – wikipedia potted summary here:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_2011_Census#Voluntary_long-form_survey_controversy -a.v.

    alfred venison

    August 29, 2011 at 10:40 pm

  3. […] Why disband the contamination group (Adaptation to Climate Change Research Group) that was responsib… […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: